too much common sense

george monbiot has written a couple of cracking articles that make too much sense. i mean, they make so much sense that for the government to accept them and then adopt his proposals so that they became real in our country, would make the government look utterly ridiculous - and so, they'll probably never happen.
you can read the one on 'defence' here, and the other on the renewal of public transport, with particular reference to the coach, here.
i just sent an email to the today programme saying how great it would be to hear george, alan storkey and sir rod eddington debate the renewing of the coach and bus system, as described in george's article.
why not send them an email yerself?

muggings - cause, effect, and hope

excellent interview on bbc radio4's today programme this morning, that looks at the question of why young people go around mugging others. you can listen again here.
youthworkers, camila batmangelidgh of kids company, and shaun bailey bring a damning critique and indictment on our liberal democracy that has neglected the care and safety of our children so that they actually feel unsafe in the world. that feeling of being unsafe coupled with a lack of love and care, along with a relentless media-driven diet of violence places too many children literally into survival mode that means the only way they can see that they can be safe is to become known as dangerous.
of course, this sounds like more liberal wishy-washy excuse-making for bad behaviour, but i find myself saying more often these days, that delinquent parents and adults are making delinquent children.
we do well to remember that jesus welcomed children into his circle in such a way that shocked his culture, when he said, 'to such as these (children) belong the kingdom of god'. in other words, the 'status' of children is second to none in the eyes of the king of the universe. that also means that the responsibility for the love and care and nurture and discipline of these first-class citizens of god's kingdom lies with adults.
the critique of the youthworkers mentioned above is that adults are the cause of their own misery because they have failed in their responsibility to the children they have begotten.
this is a complex issue that will not suffer simplistic solutions. it will require nothing less than a cultural shift, probably taking a generation or more to flow through.
but its not hopeless. einstein said that it only takes 8% of any given population to change for the rest of the population to change with them.
people like camila and shaun need to play a louder and more prominent role in helping our society to understand what's going on and develop strategies at a political level that are more effective than what we currently have.
churches need to take heart and realise that they have an enormous part to play in this issue too, as they provide most of the country's youthworkers. organisations like frontier youth trust and oasis trust do great work in training youthworkers and contributing at a significant political level by engaging in prophetic dialogue with the makers of public policy. youthwork programmes like ascension eagles cheerleaders take a long term approach to working with young people and their wider community that actually effect a cultural shift at a micro level.
the downward spiral of violence and revenge is not the only way to be feel safe in our world. the dear man whose son was murdered by 2 young men for his mobile phone and travel card has chosen to look for a better way.
the season of advent leading to christmas reminds us that god did not, and has not given up on the human condition, flawed as it is. the decision of god to live among us as jesus of nazareth, taking responsibility for the children he created continues to inspire a real, living and transformational hope that the way life is, is not necessarily the way it needs to be, and that the human condition is actually redeemable.
there is hope yet, and there are those who live hope.

stop the traffik

check out this short film, with daniel bedingfield, about this most heinous of human crimes.
then check out the rest of the website, and join with me and sign and up to start the process of doing something about it.
see also the protest4 link on the side, one of the pioneers of which is me old mate si johnston, and emily's link that keeps us in touch with her work in bangkok with girls involved in prostitution, some of whom are there against their will.
this issue of slavery and trafficking of people will gain more momentum over the next few months in the leadup to the 200th anniversary of the abolition of the slave trade in the british empire.
but the tragedy is, 200 years later, its still an enormous worldwide problem that continues to grow.
and what's to be done? next year will see the 200th anniversary of the abolition of the slave trade, with many commemoration and other kinds of activities to mark it. today, the prime minister, tony blair, spoke of his 'deep sorrow' that it ever happened. you can read the full text of his speech here. you can also listen again to a couple of slots on the bbc's 'today' programme that open some thoughts on what might happen if the pm offered a full apology. there are people here who want an apology to include financial reparation.
i think that, while an apology would be a good thing, it will undoubtedly open up a whole raft of legal claims made for financial and other kinds of reparation. that in itself is not necessarily a bad thing, but the real problem with that kind of thing is that inevitably the legal fraternity gets involved and any pot of money put aside to pay claims to genuine claimants is significantly reduced after legal bills.
i remember listening to an example of the church in canada being taken to court by the aboriginal peoples of canada for damages in land settlements, and 90% of the money went to lawyers and only 10% to those who had a rightful claim.
in australia (when i left 7 years ago) the pm would not offer a full apology to the aboriginal people for their displacement from their ancestral lands for fear of opening a pandora's box of legal and financial woe (to the federal govt) that could be enormous. the aboriginal people did not want money, only an apology for the wrong done them.
the issues around slavery and peopletrafficking will increase over the next 3 months as the bicentenary draws closer.
what do you think about it all?

sailing drama

Between the hours of 04.45 and 06.30 GMT this morning a dramatic rescue operation took place in the treacherous icy waters of the Southern Ocean. Devastated solo sailor Alex Thomson (GBR) abandoned his yacht HUGO BOSS, after it suffered severe structural failure to the keel, and dramatically transferred via life raft to Mike Golding's yacht ECOVER. Thomson and Golding (GBR) both highly experienced yachtsmen and fellow competitors in the VELUX 5 Oceans race, carried out the rescue operation with the utmost caution. It took four attempts to get Thomson safely onboard ECOVER and the transfer took one hour and 45 minutes. from the velux5oceans website.

the double reality of sadness and heroics involved in this rescue has not been well reported by radio4. they talk about it as a capsize, which is only partly true, if the velux5oceans website is right. rado4 gives a picture that is open to speculation as to why hugo boss is being abandoned, whereas the cause is clearly gear failure of the swinging keel coming apart. this is not difficult to get right from a reportage perspective, so why not get it right? sailors all over the world will be annoyed at the amateurish attempt by the bbc in its coverage.

below is a very clear and well-presented precis of the situation from one of the competitors, the legendary sir robin knox-johnston, reported on the velux5oceans website: "The news that Alex Thomson has had to abandon his boat Hugo Boss in the Southern Ocean is only relieved by the fact that he is safe. His boat was one of the best prepared for the 2006 Velux 5 Oceans race, and the fact that he has suffered a mechanical failure is a tragedy. This was not a new or experimental boat. It is a well tried one with plenty of miles beneath its keel, so for a major mechanical failure - either something was slowly weakening or there was a sudden abnormal strain - but we may never know the answer to that now.

"It comes at a time when the IMOCA boats had had a very good safety record in recent years since the rules were tightened after the Bullimore keel failure, and members were congratulating themselves that they had not had the sort of problems that were experienced by the Volvo fleet last year. The IMOCA 60 boats are probably the most tested yachts before they can receive their certificate and take part in an event, so a structural failure like this may need some hard thinking about, to avoid such problems in the future.

"This also means that those of us at sea in the race are looking at our own keel arrangements and just wondering how secure they are, but few of us can give an answer. We are seamen and sailors, not engineers and designers, and not qualified to say whether what we have is safe or not. We take to sea what we are given but at the back of our minds is: 'What happens if?'

"This is not the first rescue of this type in the race. In the first event in 1982 Tony Lush was picked up by another American between Africa and Australia, and on the next leg Englishman Richard Broadhead beat back for three days to rescue French Navy Commander Jacques de Roux whose boat had been holed. This was the incident that led to the adoption of compulsory watertight doors for this race. In 1990 Bertie Reed picked up fellow South African John Martin after his boat had hit an iceberg.

"It is an axiom in these races that the nearest assistance will probably come from another competitor, apart from some excellent exceptions by the Royal Australian Navy. The good news is that Alex is safe and it won't be long before he is out racing again."

congrats to mike golding on his skill, courage, and exemplary effort in keeping the code of the sea in going to the aid of a sailor in trouble. i know what its like to be passed by when i've been in trouble (albeit nowhere near the scale of this one!)
and commiserations to alex thomson on having his race end in such a way.

humphrys in search of god 3 - judaism

john humphrys interviewed dr jonathan sacks, chief rabbi, yesterday in the conclusion of his 3 part series in his search for god.

yet another really good interview that pulled no punches but where 2 men engaged one another with the big issues that so much of humanity grapples with. a big part of the interview was around the question of theodicy (the problem of evil), and, as you would expect with a jewish context, how god has allowed so much suffering with his own chosen people.

i think dr sacks tried to encourage mr humphrys, who seems genuine in his real desire and questioning to find faith, that he's not that far from it. dr sacks said that faith lies in the question - as the refusal of god to give easy answers means humans learning to wrestle with the reality of life, and so become more fully human in the process.

you can listen to it again here.

humphrys in search of god 2 - islam

the second installment of john h's search for god was an excellent interview with prof tariq ramadan, a leading islamic scholar. you can listen to it again here.
i was struck by prof ramadan's reasonableness and how critically aware he is of himself and of islam. of islam, he is willing to take a critical examination of the qur'an by looking at the text from an historical and contextual perspective, and ask what that text is saying in today's 21st century context. of himself, he is aware that he is a muslim living in a western liberal democracy and who wants to engage fully in that democracy as a fully committed muslim.
he seems like the kind of voice we need to hear more of - that the media needs to invest giving prime air time to. one of the great failings of our media, in my opinion, is that it gives too much time to extreme views (of anything really) as extremists create sensation, and sensation sells copy.
i think it would be helpful for our society to hear more debate between people like prof ramadan, who claims to speak for the silent majority of the muslim population of britain, and people like abu izzadeen, who claims to speak for a more extremist view of what islam is about.
see my other posts about this kind of stuff here and here.
perhaps mr humphrys and his colleagues might start to fill their agenda with better quality debate than the current crop of sensationalist trivia that fuels fear, isolationism, and bigotry.
this will not go away by itself.

humphrys in search of god 1 - christianity

from the beeb's website:

John Humphrys as you've never heard him before - talking with religious leaders about his unfulfilled desire to believe in God.

How is faith possible in a world of suffering, much of it arguably caused by religion or religious extremism and to which God seems to turn a blind eye? Is there a place for religion in an age dominated by science?

the first in the series of 3 was john h speaking with the archbishop of canterbury, dr rowan williams. i thought the interview started off well, with the arch looking like he was going to get some of that lovely, 'under-your-skin' questioning of john going; trying to get john to articulate what was going on for him about his search for god. but then it seemed to get fuzzy, and i felt like the arch didn't do as well as he could have. who knows, he may have had a bad day....

you can listen to the half-hour interview again, here.

there are 2 other shows to come on bbc radio4. they are with Professor Tariq Ramadan, Tuesday 7th November, 09:02, repeated Tuesday 7th November, 21:30; and Sir Jonathan Sacks, Chief Rabbi, Tuesday 14th November, 09:02,repeated Tuesday 14th November, 21:30.

astonishment at the importance of religion?

at the end of the today programme this morning is a 5 mins interview where john humphreys, currently in iraq, speaks with canon andrew white, the anglican vicar of basra who is also working with the iraqi prime minister on religious reconciliation issues.
mr humphreys actually sounded astonished at one point half way through the interview when canon white referred to a genuine ignorance on behalf of the major players in the pre-emptive war about what place religion played in the life of the iraqi nation prior to the war. it seems the general thought amongst the 'allies' was that iraq was a secular country so that religion was not going to be a factor post-invasion. and the astonishing thing is that its only now, 3 years later, that the americans in particular are starting to wake up to the religious element and how powerful it is in what is happening currently inside iraq. but is it too late to do anything about it? canon white says it is very late. any engagement with efforts at reconciliation will take place outside iraq as its even too dangerous for the insurgency leaders to be inside iraq. they actually command their operations from outside the country.
you can listen to the 0854 interview here.
there are a couple of thoughts that come to mind:
1. one of the first rules of war is: know your enemy. why didn't the americans and british take more cognisance of this middle-eastern country's religious heritage so as to anticipate where religion would factor in post-war reconstruction? what's that you say, there was no post-war planning....?!
2. while there has been some move toward democratic government, the reality remains that the democratically elected leaders are completely under 'house arrest' by the insurgents, as the leaders are confined to the 'green zones' and are unable to engage with their local communities because of the levels of violence and manifest dangers. is democracy really what the psyche of the iraqi people actually resonates with? again, before you go to war, know your enemy.
3. canon white, and people like him, seem key in this next phase of negotiation between western governments and insurgent leaders. will the western leaders give sufficient credence and time to this humble, yet forthright anglican priest who has before him the ministry of reconciliation (2 cor 5:18,19) to find a way to bring together different worldviews and religious beliefs so that perhaps a third way of some hybrid form of government may emerge from the ashes of what was once the ancient seat of civilisation?
i for one, would like to hear more from the bbc on this.