Showing posts with label values. Show all posts
Showing posts with label values. Show all posts

Sunday, December 24, 2006

arise (hon) 'sir' bono

yep, its true. bono's being awarded an honourary knighthood for "his services to the music industry and for his humanitarian work".
you can read more on U2's website here, and the beeb's site here.
i think that's great, and i think its an honour for him - a great man.
i think 2 of his great quotes are:
"celebrity is currency, and i want to spend mine well"; and
"we can't do everything, but the things we can, we must".
congratulations to him.

Wednesday, December 20, 2006

save paper at christmas


great tip from friends of the earth about saving paper:

It is estimated that over Christmas as much as 83 square km of wrapping paper will end up in UK rubbish bins, enough to cover an area larger than Guernsey! Use less by re-using gift wrap, or wrap gifts with unwanted posters, wallpaper, pages from glossy mags - or even spare pieces of fabric. Use string instead of tape, so that the paper can be re-used.


For more practical advice, competitions, quiz and discussion forums see:

www.foe.co.uk/living/

Monday, December 18, 2006

a song for advent


watch it through to the end.
this is the kind of stuff that stirs me.
this is the kind of stuff that is dangerous.
danger is involved when you want to change the world.
changing the world is at the heart of why jesus was born.
if you're into dangerous living, then check out the next soliton gathering here.
Lazyb - Underwear Goes Inside The Pants

Friday, December 15, 2006

Email your MP about the killer in the kitchen

here's something practical you can do this advent, as in your waiting for the return of the lord, his changing of your hearts leads to practical action in the way your behaviour affects others - particularly the poor and powerless (see luke 3:7-18)
follow the links that show the text of the early day motion, and which mps have already signed. if yours isn't there, then follow the next links to send them an email.
i've emailed my mp, neil gerrard today.

Thursday, December 14, 2006

blogging set to peak in 2007

the bbc report here that the rise in blogging will end next year. there are 2 main reasons: those who have a predisposition to blog will have already started; and, others get bored with it and move on.
interesting to see this, as i've been wondering lately when blogging will become yesterday, and how long the rising phenomenon can continue.
i've gotten bored with it at times myself, as you can see from the archive list for the middle of the year.
and sometimes i wonder what the value of a blog is if its not generating discussion. i know that there are some folks who like what i write, and some who look in everyday would be disappointed if i stopped.
i wish i'd started it 5 years ago when jonny baker was telling me about it when he first started. i could've done some good stuff then about the community work and the garden cafe that i was heavily involved in.
the main reason for starting this year, was actually so that i didn't have to write an end of year newsletter as those i would send it to could keep up with what's going on throughout the year. but even that hasn't happened very well.
it's also been interesting to see how many others have put down their blogs over this year for all manner of reasons, including the time it takes (tho a real good bit of advice is that 'if it takes longer than 10 mins/day, then forget it'); boredom; and the subtle one of idolatry.
i'm still open-minded about whether its worth it as my readership is not large, and my mood can swing.
but for now.....

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

reflections on institutionalised religion

i wrote the following about 4 years ago following a visit to an anglican church in the suburbs of london. i think that even after all that time, it still sums up where my heart is.

My reflections

The church seems to have an underlying, and perhaps unconscious theology of pastoral care and maintenance, which doesn’t find creative, risky, thoughtful, and proactive ways of getting the congregation to engage with the local community.

It is good at having social clubs, is very welcoming to new people who come, and is probably characterised by a ‘belonging before believing’ approach. This does seem to produce some fruit.

The high church ritual is done well, and so is attractive to people who want that sort of worship. The teaching was very short, unimaginative, thin on content, and designed for an encouraging feel-good factor - more along the line of moralising, and of how to live a good life than grappling with the alternative vision of the Kingdom of God here on earth now, as it is in heaven.

I felt that the church was very much stuck in the Christendom paradigm – particularly around the idea that ‘being a good Christian means being a good citizen.’ So in their context, church was a place to come to be encouraged and confirmed in maintaining the treadmill of their middle-class mediocrity. There didn’t seem to be an inherent theology of mission at the heart of the church.

I couldn’t stand it.

In reflecting on what that experience means for my own future ministry, I could only pray that I don’t end up in that kind of situation. It looked like a treadmill that would slowly grind me to death.

It confirmed to me that I’m interested in exploring non-traditional forms of ministry, though I’m not sure I can adequately articulate what that might look like in practice.

What I do know, is that at base level there must be at least 3 core values:
1. a theology of mission that actively engages in creative, organic, and contextually meaningful praxis;
2. a prophetic heart that is willing to speak of the Kingdom of God to both church and world;
3. an active pursuit of spirituality that is given time and space to explore my relationship with God at a mystic level (without wanting to sound pretentious).

I want to find a community of people who are willing to explore these values and who encourage one another in their exploration of ‘life in all its fullness’.

I know that I’m good at conducting the ‘hatch, match, and despatch’ ceremonies that non-religious people want the religious community to perform for them. I know from what people say, that they sense God when I shepherd them through those times.

But I don’t want to walk on a treadmill.

I know that in church my teaching and preaching is able to articulate for people the joys and pains of life, and my stories connect with their story so that they are unsettled, comforted, challenged, and intrigued enough to want their lives shaped by the Jesus I speak of.

I love to administer the sacraments, and watch the ancient story come to life in people’s responses as they partake in God’s goodness to them.

I enjoy the exploration of new and different forms of living the story; of working with others who are different and far more creative than me; of seeing the untamed wildness of God in people when they realise that being who they are is what freedom actually means; of listening to the poetry and art of those who seek God outside of the forms of mediocrity which says, ‘but this is the way its always been done.’

I want to live in commune with the rhythms of nature’s seasons, and feel the movement of the ancient Christian story as it swells and ebbs with its own seasons. I want to see people’s lives shaped and re-shaped year by year as they connect their life story to the Jesus story, and allow their own lives to be moulded by his.

But I don’t want to walk on a treadmill.

I want to be involved in the unstoppable mega-swell of the ocean of God’s change, and be swept up in the waves that will sweep the beach clean of the edifices humanity has erected, leaving only driftwood, pebbles, sea-weed, and sand…and children to play in the gently lapping wavelets under an early morning sun.

I don’t want those children to be oppressed by the weight of faceless committees, to be denied the fruits of their forefathers’ stewardship, to be abandoned like unwanted babies by a mother who knows she is dying but who lives in self-centred denial. So I want to be in a position where I can help the children acquire the resources they need and which are their rightful inheritance.

I want to listen to the children as they speak of God, and watch how they play as his Spirit bubbles up in them. I want to speak into the halls of power to ensure that the children have the resources of their inheritance that their Spirit-bubbling requires. And I want them to feel the freedom and encouragement from a changed mother to explore new forms of living the gospel.

So I can’t walk on a treadmill. My heart is restless, yet aches for rest. My history shows that I am constantly moving, yet I yearn to settle and put down roots.

I live in the tension of the ‘here, but not yet.’

I am a traveller.

Friday, December 08, 2006

all things coffee


thanks to si kirby for this tip about a new, ethical coffee distribution company, ethical addictions.
this looks like a great little fair trade company, who even give you a free sample of their coffee delivered to your door! and make sure you click on the little movie link to get a look at the the promo for the plantation in tanzania.

and a fabulous new type of coffee machine that i'd love to get, the presso (that's it in the picture). you can buy it here in the uk through culinaire.

there are quite a few good sites about coffee, like caffeist (coffee geekery), and grendel's green coffee blog (passionate about home roasting - this looks like the thing to try).

mmmmmmmm........coffeeeeeeee

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

billy's values debate and bill(y) of rights

just finished reading billy bragg's book, 'the progressive patriot - a search for belonging'.
i enjoyed it, even though i've had sod-all of a history with billy bragg. i remember hearing him for the first time on the radio in the car in australia, circa 1997. i'd heard of him by reputation through friends, but never bought an album or followed his career.
i saw him for the first time 2 summers ago at greenbelt festival, in cheltenham. i think he was there for pretty much the whole festival, and shared podiums discussing globalisation etc with such luminaries as dame anita roddick. he also was the headlining act for the last night on the mainstage, and played a great night - just him and his guitar. i remember him commenting that he really liked greenbelt, as it was 'a festival that had real soul'.
anyway, his book seems well researched. i say 'seems', because i'm no great shakes on history, but what he writes seems to ring enough bells for me to ring true enough. his own family history is very important to him as he unwinds his thesis on what being british, and english, means today. the history ranges from pre-roman times when his own backyard was an impressive hill fort that was important for international trade, through the purpose and signing of magna carta, the industrial revolution, the early dockers strikes that led to the early unions, the 2 world wars, his own musical journey, right down to today's debates about values, and his own desire to see a formal bill of rights that he wants to see on the back of the (inevitable?) identity card.
and that's where he gets to really: wanting a debate on what he sees as the traditional british values of fairness, tolerance, and decency; along with a debate on this country producing its own bill of rights.
perhaps i'm naive, but as an outsider, born and raised in the one-time 'colony' of australia, yet someone whose own history is directly connected to the mills of yorkshire, and whose family fought at gallipoli, i think billy is onto something. he's wanting to more readily define what britain is 'for', as opposed to having about it a history and air of what it stands against. for newcomers to anything, let alone a new country in which to settle, surely its a helpful, nay, needful thing for the newcomers to have a clear understanding of what the new place stands 'for'.
in my post last month on 'beneath the veil', is a link to a doco in which a muslim woman experiments in wearing a veil, as she doesn't normally do so. at the end of the doco she makes a marked plea to, 'not tell us what you're against, but please, tell us want you want us to be part of.'
we're finding out about this stuff in microcosm in our church in our current process of redefining our purpose, values, and vision.
here's a brief view of how we're going about it:
part 1: your purpose. this is about what you are for.
part 2: your values. this is about what you are like.
part 3: your vision: this is about what you do.
its a bit like a cake really:
the purpose of a cake is to be eaten and enjoyed. there’s nothing outstanding about that, as its probably true for all cakes.
the values of the cake are about its ingredients. the ingredients give the flavour and texture. highly important.
the vision of the cake is what the cake actually turns out like. (remember that metaphors have limited use...)
your purpose and values will determine your vision. what you are for, and what you are like will be worked out in a concrete context.
for example, if your group and my group had exactly the same purpose and values (and its quite possible for that to be true), but we were in different parts of the country with radically different contexts, then the ways in which our purpose and values are expressed in concrete terms would be very different because of the differences in context. but people who encounter us in our different contexts would encounter a deep and noticeable similarity in what we say we're for (purpose) and what that feels like (values) to be part of, even though the way that's worked out in concrete life will necessarily be different because of the different contexts.
it seems to me, that a real problem with the idea of debating 'values', is that for a country like this with such a long-established history, the inhabitants with a long historical connection with the country think that the established values are 'obvious'. but the problem is, that for newcomers, those values are not obvious because they're not actually written down and its very hard to get a consensus on exactly what they are.
you could say something similar about the way churches operate too.
anyway, there's another review of billy's book here by john davies, someone more erudite and intelligent than me.
but whatever you think of what i've written here, i reckon billy bragg's book is well worth a read, and offers something of substance, and a realistic suggestion for taking the current public debate on being british and english, forward.